Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan After Resident Fall

Waterford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 07-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to review and revise the care plan to include a new intervention following a resident's fall. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia with agitation, a history of falling, and anxiety disorder, experienced an unwitnessed fall after being assisted to bed. The clinical record showed that the resident had severely impaired cognition, required moderate assistance for transfers and ambulation, and was at high risk for falls as identified by a recent Fall Risk Evaluation. Despite these risk factors and the occurrence of a new fall, the Accident and Investigation documentation and the Resident Care Plan did not reflect the addition of any new interventions after the incident. Interviews with facility staff revealed that no new interventions were added to the care plan following the fall, and the responsible LPN was unaware that an intervention needed to be added for falls without injury. The Director of Nursing Services confirmed that an appropriate intervention should have been added to the care plan after the fall, and that the RN supervisor was responsible for ensuring the Accident and Investigation was fully completed. The facility's policy directed staff to implement additional or different interventions if falls recurred, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙