Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Ensure Timely Podiatry Care for Resident with Toe Infection

Glastonbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with diabetes and polyneuropathy, who was dependent on staff for personal care and had a history of memory recall deficits, developed redness, swelling, and pain in the left great toe. The care plan required daily foot checks and prompt reporting of any abnormalities. After a family member reported the toe issue, an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) evaluated the resident, diagnosed an infection, and ordered antibiotics, warm soaks, and a podiatry consult. The APRN also directed that the resident be placed on the podiatrist's priority schedule for an upcoming visit. Despite these orders, the facility failed to ensure the resident was added to the podiatrist's priority list. Although the scheduling secretary reported emailing the podiatry office to include the resident, the facility's podiatry list for the scheduled visit did not reflect the resident's name. As a result, the resident was not seen by the podiatrist as intended. Interviews with facility staff and the podiatrist confirmed that the resident should have been prioritized and that Medicare coverage was not a barrier to timely care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙