Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Implement and Document Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Care Interventions

Glastonbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with multiple diagnoses, including altered mental status, muscle weakness, atherosclerotic heart disease, and congestive heart failure, was admitted to the facility with a stage 2 pressure injury to the coccyx. Upon admission, the resident was assessed as high risk for pressure injuries using the Braden Scale and required substantial assistance for bed mobility, personal hygiene, and transfers. Despite these findings, there was no evidence that preventative interventions, such as an air mattress or a scheduled turning and repositioning regimen, were initiated or documented in the days following admission, as required by facility policy. The resident's care plan, initiated five days after admission, included interventions for pressure injury prevention and treatment, but physician orders and nursing documentation did not reflect the implementation of these interventions. The pressure injury progressed to an unstageable wound, and a new facility-acquired unstageable pressure injury developed on the resident's left heel. Throughout the resident's stay, there was a lack of documentation indicating that an air mattress was provided or that a turning and repositioning schedule was followed, even after the wounds worsened and new wounds developed. Additionally, weekly skin observation tools were either not completed or not documented as required by facility policy. Interviews with facility staff, including the DNS, wound physician, and wound nurse, confirmed that interventions such as air mattress placement and frequent turning and repositioning should have been implemented immediately upon admission and after wound deterioration. Staff were unable to explain why these interventions were not ordered or documented. The facility's policy clearly directed these interventions for residents with stage 2 or greater pressure injuries, but the required actions were not taken or recorded, leading to the identified deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙