Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Timely Investigate Alleged Abuse

Wallingford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to timely investigate an allegation of abuse involving a resident with chronic pain, depression, and anxiety, who was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living. The resident reported to the social worker that a staff member had shaken their dinner tray in a manner that made the resident feel fearful it might be thrown at them. The incident was said to have occurred on a Sunday, and the resident initially reported their concerns to an LPN, who stated she would inform the RN supervisor (DNS). However, the DNS did not visit the resident that day, and the resident indicated that no one else came to discuss the incident until days later. Interviews and documentation revealed that both the LPN and the aide involved informed the DNS about the resident's concerns on the day of the incident. The DNS acknowledged being aware of the situation but did not interview the resident at that time, only learning later during the investigation that the resident had felt afraid. Facility policy required prompt reporting and investigation of abuse allegations, including obtaining statements and completing a reportable event form, but these steps were not carried out in a timely manner, resulting in a delay in addressing the resident's report of potential abuse.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙