Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
E

Failure to Consistently Complete and Document Advance Directives

Shelton, Connecticut Survey Completed on 05-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its own policy regarding the completion and documentation of residents' advance directives for four residents. In multiple cases, the required Medical Interventions Consent Form, which records a resident's choices for life-sustaining treatments and other medical interventions, was either missing from the clinical record or not signed by the resident or their representative. For example, one resident with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia and kidney cancer, who was cognitively intact, did not have a completed or signed consent form in the record, despite a physician order indicating CPR as the code status. Similarly, another resident with dementia and chronic kidney disease, who was moderately cognitively impaired, also lacked a signed consent form, even though a physician order for CPR was present. In another instance, a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses had a Medical Interventions Consent Form completed by a representative via telephone, indicating comfort measures only and do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate status. However, after a psychiatric hospitalization and re-admission, there was a period during which no physician order for advance directives was present in the clinical record. Staff interviews revealed that the process for obtaining and documenting advance directives was inconsistent, with responsibilities split between nursing supervisors and social workers, and follow-up with representatives sometimes limited to leaving phone messages. Additionally, a resident admitted with sepsis, heart failure, and endocarditis, who was cognitively intact, did not have a code status order in place for eight days after admission. During this time, the resident would have been classified as full code and provided CPR by default. Staff interviews confirmed that code status should be established upon admission, and that verbal consent could be obtained if the resident was unable to sign. The facility's policy required that advance directives be reviewed with the resident or representative, documented on the consent form, and accompanied by a physician order, but these steps were not consistently followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙