Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Implement Scheduled Toileting for Incontinent Resident

Danbury, Connecticut Survey Completed on 06-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement appropriate interventions to restore or manage bladder and bowel continence for a resident with a history of overactive bladder, urge incontinence, congestive heart failure, and prior bladder cancer. Despite multiple quarterly Bowel and Bladder Program Screeners indicating the resident was a good candidate for retraining or scheduled toileting, and urology consults recommending timed toileting and other interventions, there was no evidence that a toileting program or bladder retraining was trialed. The resident was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance with toileting, and had functional limitations, but the care plan and clinical record did not reflect any attempt to initiate a toileting program as recommended by both the screeners and the urologist. The care plan interventions focused on perineal care, monitoring for infection, and use of disposable briefs, but did not address the recommendations for scheduled toileting or retraining. Physician orders for medications related to bowel and bladder management were present, but the lack of communication and follow-through on the results of the continence screeners and urology recommendations led to a failure in providing appropriate care aimed at restoring or improving continence. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the nursing staff did not inform the care team of the screener results, resulting in missed opportunities to trial a toileting program.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙