Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement and Update Safety Interventions for Accident Prevention

Westminster, Colorado Survey Completed on 06-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of safety interventions for multiple residents, resulting in deficiencies related to accident hazards and prevention. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering and exit-seeking behaviors eloped from the facility. Despite this event and subsequent removal of his wander alert device on two occasions, the facility did not reassess his elopement risk or update interventions accordingly. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the effectiveness of 15-minute checks, and there was no documentation of additional exit-seeking assessments after the resident refused to wear the wander alert device. Another resident, who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had a history of falls and seizures, was observed multiple times in bed without the required fall mat in place, despite this being a care-planned intervention. Several staff members entered or passed by the resident's room without ensuring the fall mat was present. Staff interviews indicated confusion about whether the fall mat was still an active intervention, and the intervention was not consistently documented or implemented as required by the care plan. A third resident with a history of falls and mild cognitive impairment experienced 14 falls in less than six months. The care plan was not consistently updated after each fall to reflect a review of the effectiveness of interventions or the addition of new interventions. Documentation of interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviews was often delayed or missing, and new interventions, such as staff education or equipment changes, were not always added to the care plan. There was also a lack of documentation to show that staff were following scheduled interventions, such as toileting programs, and that care plans were revised in response to changes in the resident's condition or fall risk.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙