Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Provide Restorative Services for Residents with Limited Mobility

Grand Junction, Colorado Survey Completed on 06-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate restorative services and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for two residents with limited range of motion (ROM) and mobility needs. For one resident with a history of stroke and hemiplegia, the care plan directed staff to provide active and passive ROM exercises, but there was no documentation that these restorative services were actually provided. Despite requests from the resident's representative for therapy screening and restorative services, the facility informed them that such services were unavailable due to staffing issues. The interdisciplinary team recommended therapy evaluation after a fall, but the evaluation and initiation of restorative services were delayed. Another resident, also with a history of stroke and hemiplegia, experienced a decline in function prior to discharge. The resident's representative reported that restorative nursing services were not offered or discussed as an option to help maintain function after therapy services ended. The care plan encouraged participation in activities to promote mobility, but there was no evidence that a restorative program was recommended or implemented by the nursing department after therapy discharge. Interviews with the DON and ADON confirmed that the facility had not had a restorative program for several months and was only able to offer meal assistance during that period. The lack of a functioning restorative program resulted in residents not receiving the necessary services to maintain or improve their mobility, as outlined in their care plans and recommended by the interdisciplinary team.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙