Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Timely Notify Ombudsman of Resident Transfer/Discharge

Riverside, California Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide the required proposed transfer and discharge notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman at the same time the notice was given to the resident and/or their representative for two sampled residents. For one resident with a history of pelvic fracture who was being discharged to board and care on hospice, the notice was signed by the resident and given to the family member, but the Ombudsman was not notified until the following day. Similarly, for another resident with coronary artery disease and a history of coronary artery bypass grafting, the discharge notice was provided to the resident's representative, but the Ombudsman received the notice a day later. Interviews and record reviews confirmed that the facility's Director of Social Services typically sent the notice to the Ombudsman on the day of discharge, rather than concurrently with the notice to the resident or representative. The facility's policy requires that the Ombudsman be notified at the same time as the resident and representative. This lapse resulted in the Ombudsman not being informed in a timely manner, as required by policy and regulation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙