Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Incontinence Care Plan Based on Accurate Assessment

South Gate, California Survey Completed on 07-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise the incontinence care plan for one resident following inaccurate documentation of the resident's continence status. Upon admission, the resident was assessed and documented as having bladder incontinence by a registered nurse, and a care plan was developed instructing staff to apply and change incontinence briefs every two hours and as needed. However, the resident was actually continent and able to use a urinal independently, as confirmed by both the resident and the registered nurse who observed the resident's ability to request and use a urinal without issue. Despite this, the care plan continued to reflect incontinence, and the resident was kept in incontinence briefs, which hindered his ability to use a urinal independently. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's actual continence status, and that revisions should have been made to ensure appropriate interventions. The facility's policy required ongoing assessment and timely revision of care plans as resident information changed, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙