Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Complete Care Plans for Two Residents

South Gate, California Survey Completed on 07-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement complete care plans for two residents, resulting in a deficiency. For one resident, the admission record showed diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure and hypotension, with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicating a need for two-person assistance for repositioning in bed. The MDS Nurse confirmed that this level of assistance was necessary for safety and should have been included in the care plan, but no such care plan was present. The absence of this care plan meant that staff did not have documented guidance on the required assistance level for safe care. For another resident, the admission record listed muscle wasting, lack of coordination, and generalized muscle weakness, with the MDS indicating substantial to maximal assistance needed for mobility. A progress note documented a verbal exchange between the resident and a responsible party, which was considered possible verbal abuse. The Licensed Vocational Nurse and the Director of Nursing both stated that incidents of suspected or alleged abuse should be care planned to prevent psychosocial harm and future incidents. However, no care plan was developed to address the suspected abuse, contrary to facility policy requiring care plan updates for such events.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙