Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Request Regarding Caregiver Assignment

Van Nuys, California Survey Completed on 08-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's explicit request to not have a specific Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) provide care or be present in her room upon readmission. The resident, who had diagnoses including a left femur fracture, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, morbid obesity, and generalized anxiety disorder, had intact cognition and decision-making capacity. Upon readmission, the resident communicated her request to the case manager, who acknowledged it and assured her that the CNA would not be assigned to her care or be present. Despite this, the CNA was initially assigned to the resident's room and, after being informed of the restriction, was reassigned to the roommate but still entered the room and interacted with the resident, including responding to a call light and providing ice water. Interviews with facility staff, including the Assistant Director of Staff Development (ADSD), the case manager, and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that the resident's request was known and that the CNA should not have entered the room or interacted with the resident. The facility's policy on dignity and privacy requires that residents be treated with respect and that their rights and preferences be honored. The DON acknowledged that the CNA's presence in the room had the potential to cause the resident increased anxiety, fear, and discomfort, which was contrary to the facility's stated policy and the resident's expressed wishes.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙