Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Right to Self-Determination in Medication Administration

Santa Monica, California Survey Completed on 07-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to honor a resident's right to self-determination and participation in care by not administering a physician-ordered topical medication, Triamcinolone Acetonide External Cream 0.1%, to the resident's right elbow. The resident, who was alert, oriented, and able to communicate through lip reading and nodding, had a recurring rash diagnosed as fungal dermatitis. Despite the resident's ability to make her own decisions, staff did not offer the medication to her, instead deferring to the refusal of her representative, who was not the designated decision maker. The resident expressed that the ointment provided relief from itching, but staff did not consult her directly regarding her preference for treatment. Interviews with facility staff, including a treatment nurse and the Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed that the resident was capable of making her own medical decisions and should have been involved in her care planning and medication administration. The facility's policy on resident rights also emphasized the importance of resident involvement in treatment decisions. The failure to administer the prescribed medication and to involve the resident in her own care planning constituted a violation of her rights as outlined in facility policy and federal and state regulations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙