Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
E

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility and Communication Support

Torrance, California Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

Fine: $141,00024 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Nursing staff failed to ensure that the call light device was within easy reach for two residents. One resident, who was blind and required substantial to maximum assistance with mobility and transfers, was observed in bed with the call light hanging on the floor, out of reach. The resident's care plan specifically included an intervention to keep the call light within reach due to a high risk for falls and visual impairment. Staff interviews confirmed the importance of keeping the call light accessible, especially for residents with visual impairments. Another resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living, was observed requesting help to retrieve the call light, which was also found hanging on the side of the bed and not within reach. The care plan for this resident indicated the need to encourage use of the call light for assistance, but this intervention was not followed at the time of observation. Staff acknowledged the importance of call light accessibility to prevent falls and ensure timely assistance. Additionally, a resident with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and aphasia did not have a communication board available to assist with communication needs. The resident's care plan did not address aphasia, and both staff and family confirmed that a communication board had not been provided until after the issue was identified. Facility policy emphasized the use of alternative communication systems for residents with aphasia, but this was not implemented for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙