Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
E

Incorrect Low Air Loss Mattress Settings for High-Risk Residents

San Dimas, California Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that low air loss mattresses (LALMs), which are pressure-reducing devices, were set at the correct settings for two residents at high risk for pressure injuries. For one resident with functional quadriplegia and severely impaired cognition, the LALM was observed to be set at 200, despite a physician's order specifying a setting of 160 based on the resident's weight. Staff interviews confirmed that the setting was incorrect and should have been checked during daily rounds, but the discrepancy was not identified or corrected at the time of observation. Another resident, who was dependent for all activities of daily living and had a history of chronic respiratory failure and a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, was found lying on a LALM set at 400 lbs, while the resident's actual weight was 107 lbs and the physician's order specified a setting of 80. Staff interviews indicated that the correct mattress setting is essential for effective pressure redistribution and prevention of further skin breakdown, and that the mattress should be set according to the resident's actual weight as per facility policy and manufacturer instructions. Record reviews, staff interviews, and direct observations confirmed that the facility did not follow its own policy and physician orders regarding the adjustment of LALM settings based on resident weight. The failure to maintain correct mattress settings was observed for both residents, and staff were unable to provide an explanation for the discrepancies at the time of the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙