Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Resident Denied Readmission Without Proper Assessment After Hospital Transfer

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 08-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident who was transferred to a general acute care hospital was properly evaluated for readmission and was denied return to the facility without adequate assessment. The resident, who had a history of schizoaffective disorder and unspecified psychosis, was initially admitted with intact cognitive skills and required supervision or assistance with daily activities. The resident was transferred to the hospital after an incident where he hit his roommate, which was the first occurrence of such behavior. Despite this, the facility did not document any efforts to determine if the resident's needs could still be met or if he continued to pose a danger to others upon potential return. Interviews revealed that the DON instructed hospital case workers not to return the resident, citing danger to others, but admitted there was no documentation or assessment to support this decision. The DON also acknowledged that the facility's interdisciplinary team made the decision without reviewing hospital reports, treatment plans, or consulting the resident's physician. The facility's policy required a review of the discharge plan, current condition, care needs, diagnosis, treatment plan, and behavioral or psychosocial support needs, but this process was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙