Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Document Two-Person Assist for Dependent Resident in Care Plan

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

Fine: $14,015
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to document necessary interventions to prevent falls and injuries for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including a left humerus fracture, congestive heart failure, generalized muscle weakness, and myasthenia gravis. The resident was assessed as having mild cognitive impairment and was dependent on nursing staff for toileting hygiene and for rolling to either side while lying in bed, requiring a two-person assist for these activities. Despite this, the care plans reviewed did not specify the resident's dependency or the need for two-person assistance for turning and repositioning. The care plans in place addressed impaired physical mobility and risk for falls, listing general interventions such as allowing adequate response time, assessing toileting needs, and encouraging use of the call light. However, they lacked documentation of the resident's specific need for two-person assistance during turning and repositioning. The MDS Nurse confirmed that this level of dependency was identified during assessment but was not included in the care plan, as she assumed that CNAs would understand the implications of the term "dependent" without explicit instructions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙