Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
D

Failure to Ensure Arbitration Agreements Signed by Authorized Decision-Makers

La Mirada, California Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that binding arbitration agreements were provided to and signed by individuals with decision-making capacity for two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including dementia, depression, and bipolar disorder, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and History & Physical (H&P) indicated moderate cognitive impairment and a lack of mental capacity to make decisions. Despite this, the admissions assistant did not review the H&P prior to presenting the arbitration agreement and relied solely on a brief conversation to assess alertness. The resident signed the agreement, even though the admissions assistant later acknowledged that the responsible party should have been involved due to the resident's incapacity. Similarly, another resident with metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia was assessed as moderately impaired and unable to make medical decisions. The admissions assistant explained the arbitration agreement directly to the resident, who signed it, despite the H&P indicating that decisions should be made by the responsible party. The administrator confirmed that the proper procedure was not followed, as the H&P should have been reviewed to determine decision-making capacity before presenting the arbitration agreement. The facility's policy required that residents or their representatives be fully informed to make an informed decision regarding such agreements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙