Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
B

Facility Assessment Lacks Required Involvement and Staffing Plans

Laguna Hills, California Survey Completed on 08-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that its Facility Assessment was developed with the active involvement of required individuals, including direct care staff, direct care representatives, residents, residents' representatives, and family members. The assessment also did not include a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff or a contingency plan for staffing needs. This was identified through interviews and a review of facility documents, which showed that the Facility Assessment dated 7/1/24 did not reflect the updated CMS guidance issued in June 2024. During an interview and document review, the Administrator confirmed that he was unaware of the new CMS requirements and acknowledged that the Facility Assessment had not been updated accordingly. The Administrator verified that there was no evidence of active involvement from the required parties in developing the assessment, nor were there plans addressing recruitment, retention, or contingency staffing needs included in the document.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙