Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Accommodate Communication Needs for Non-English Speaking Residents

Laguna Hills, California Survey Completed on 08-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation for the communication needs of two residents with limited English proficiency. Observations revealed that staff communicated with these residents primarily in English and relied on hand gestures, despite the residents' primary languages being Chinese and Korean, respectively. Communication cards in the residents' preferred languages were available and posted in their rooms, but staff did not utilize these resources or seek assistance from language interpretation services as outlined in facility policy. For one resident, staff members acknowledged that the resident could not understand English and required communication in Chinese. Despite this, care was provided using only English and gestures, and communication cards or translation services were not used. The resident's care plan and medical records confirmed the need for language accommodation, and staff interviews verified the lack of appropriate communication methods during care interactions. In the case of the second resident, staff believed the resident spoke Japanese, but the resident's primary language was Korean. Staff relied on hand gestures and the presence of the resident's wife for translation, even when she was not present. Communication boards in the resident's language were available but not used, and staff did not contact charge nurses for oral interpretation services. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that staff did not follow established procedures for accommodating communication needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙