Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Conduct Timely IDT Meeting After Resident Fall

Sylmar, California Survey Completed on 08-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting was conducted in a timely manner following a resident's fall, as required by the facility's own policy and procedure. The resident, who had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes, experienced a fall after attempting to steady herself on a wheelchair that was out of reach while exiting the bathroom. The resident's care plan identified her as having poor balance, an unsteady gait, and poor safety awareness, with interventions such as keeping the call light within reach and frequent visual checks. After the fall, staff physically assessed the resident and completed documentation, but there was no documented evidence that an IDT meeting occurred within the required 72-hour timeframe to investigate the incident and determine causative factors. Interviews with staff, including an LVN, the Assistant Director of Nursing, and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that facility policy mandates an IDT meeting within 72 hours of a fall to review the event, conduct a root cause analysis, and implement interventions to prevent future incidents. However, the review of the resident's electronic medical record did not show that such a meeting took place after the fall. The facility's Fall Management Program policy specifically requires the IDT-Falls Committee to meet and document their findings and actions within this timeframe, but this protocol was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙