Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0919
E

Call Lights Not Accessible to Dependent Residents

Chico, California Survey Completed on 06-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that call lights were available for use and within reach for three of five residents sampled. According to facility policy, call alert devices are to be placed within the resident's reach and staff are to answer call alerts promptly. For one resident with heart failure, dysphagia, and major depressive disorder, and another with parkinsonism, chronic pain, and anxiety, both were found lying in bed unable to locate or reach their call lights, which were observed on a nightstand behind and to the side of their beds. Both residents were dependent on staff for toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers, and their care plans specifically required that call lights be within reach. A CNA confirmed that the call lights were not accessible and admitted forgetting to return them to the residents' reach. A third resident, who had COPD, required assistance with personal care, had difficulty walking, and a history of falls, was also affected. This resident's care plan required the call light to be within reach and for staff to encourage its use. The resident's family member reported multiple instances of finding the call light on the floor, and noted that the resident would attempt to get up independently, resulting in frequent falls. The administrator confirmed that call lights should always be within reach and that it was not facility practice for them to be out of reach.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙