Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Implement Bowel and Bladder Retraining Programs for Eligible Residents

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate bowel and bladder retraining or toileting programs for two residents who were identified as good candidates for such interventions. Both residents had documented episodes of incontinence and were assessed as being able to communicate their needs and benefit from retraining programs. Despite this, neither resident was enrolled in a bowel and bladder retraining program, and staff interviews confirmed that these services were not implemented. For one resident, medical records indicated a history of urinary tract infection, acute cystitis, and mental health conditions, with assessments showing the resident required substantial assistance with toileting and was always incontinent. Staff interviews revealed that the resident could express the need to use the bathroom but was not included in any retraining program, despite a screener indicating suitability for such intervention. Nursing staff were unable to provide a reason for the lack of program implementation. The second resident had diagnoses including hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, and cirrhosis of the liver, and was also able to communicate needs despite cognitive impairment. This resident experienced episodes of incontinence, expressed a dislike for wearing diapers, and was similarly identified as a good candidate for retraining. However, the retraining program was not initiated, and staff acknowledged that the process was missed. Facility policy required that residents who are incontinent receive services to attain or maintain continence unless clinically inappropriate, but this was not followed for these two residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙