Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Dietary Menus to Bedbound Residents

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 06-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents who were unable to get out of bed without staff assistance were provided with the daily dietary menu, resulting in these residents not being able to choose their food preferences. Observations and interviews revealed that neither resident had access to the menu in their rooms, and both reported not knowing what they would be served for meals until the food was brought to them. They also stated they were not informed about alternative food options and, in some cases, would not eat if they did not like the food provided. Resident 1 was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living due to conditions such as intervertebral disc degeneration, diabetes mellitus, and sacroiliitis, but had no cognitive impairment and was able to make medical decisions. Resident 3 required substantial assistance with ADLs due to joint replacement surgery, unsteady gait, and generalized weakness, and also had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Both residents' physician orders specified particular dietary needs, but neither was given the opportunity to review or select meal options in advance. Staff interviews confirmed that menus were not provided in the residents' rooms and that some staff, including CNAs, were unaware of the daily menu. The dietary supervisor and LVN acknowledged that residents have the right to know their meal options and be informed of alternatives. The DON stated that menus were posted only in common areas, not in residents' rooms, and that residents who could not access these areas would only receive menu information if they asked. Facility policy required that residents be treated with respect and dignity and be assisted in exercising their rights, but this was not followed in the cases of these two residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙