Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Documentation for Multiple Residents

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately document the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three of twelve sampled residents, resulting in discrepancies between the residents' actual care needs and what was recorded. For one resident with end stage renal disease who was dependent on hemodialysis, the MDS did not reflect their hemodialysis status, despite physician orders and medical records indicating regular dialysis treatments outside the facility. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged this miscoding and confirmed that the resident was indeed receiving hemodialysis at the time of the assessment. Another resident's discharge destination was inaccurately documented in the MDS. Although the discharge plan documentation showed the resident was discharged to the community, the MDS incorrectly indicated a discharge to an acute hospital. The MDS Coordinator confirmed this was a miscoding and emphasized the importance of accurate MDS documentation for care planning. A third resident, who had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and was dependent on self-care and mobility, was receiving oxygen therapy and had orders for suctioning. However, the MDS assessment did not indicate the use of oxygen therapy or suctioning, despite direct observation and physician orders confirming their use. Both the MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nursing stated that the MDS should have reflected the resident's actual care needs and services provided, and that inaccurate MDS documentation does not represent the care delivered to residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙