Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
E

Failure to Provide Palatable and Appetizing Food to Residents

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 08-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide palatable, attractive, and appetizing food to residents, as evidenced by multiple complaints and observations involving seven residents. Several residents reported that the food was unappealing, lacked seasoning, and was repetitive, with chicken being served frequently. Some residents described the food as rubbery, unrecognizable, or inedible, leading them to consume very little of their meals or rely on family members to bring in outside food. Observations confirmed that residents often returned their trays untouched or ate only a small portion of the meals provided. Record reviews revealed that residents with significant medical conditions, such as diabetes, muscle weakness, anemia, and recent fractures, were affected by the poor food quality. Care plans for these residents included interventions to cater to food preferences and monitor intake, yet these interventions were not effectively implemented. For example, one resident with diabetes and at risk for malnutrition had poor oral intake and required increased nutritional supplements, but continued to express dissatisfaction with the food and reported significant weight loss. Interviews with dietary and nursing staff indicated a lack of awareness and follow-up regarding resident complaints about food palatability. The Dietary Supervisor and Dietary Manager acknowledged receiving complaints but did not maintain logs of uneaten food or consistently address the issues. The Registered Dietician was unaware of specific complaints and had not visited some newly admitted residents to discuss dietary needs. The Director of Nursing was also unaware of the extent of food-related complaints, despite policies requiring communication of such concerns. Facility policy stated that residents should receive nourishing, palatable, and well-balanced diets that consider their preferences, but this was not consistently achieved.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙