Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Provide Dignity, Privacy, and Appropriate Clothing to Residents

Chico, California Survey Completed on 08-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to uphold residents' rights to dignity and respect in two separate incidents involving two residents. In the first case, a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and significant physical limitations was not provided with appropriate clothing. Upon admission, the only clothing items documented were a pair of shoes and socks. The resident reported having only a hospital gown and brief for daily care and outside appointments, which prevented participation in activities and caused feelings of embarrassment. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of clothing for at least three weeks, with a donated outfit having gone missing after laundering. Social Services had not addressed the clothing issue until three months after admission, and there were no donated clothes available in the resident's size. In the second incident, another resident who was fully dependent on caregivers for personal care, including bathing and dressing, was not provided adequate privacy during care. Observations showed that the privacy curtain in the resident's shared room did not fully enclose the bed, allowing roommates to see personal care being provided. The CNA acknowledged the curtain's limitations and stated there was nothing more that could be done to protect the resident's privacy. The Director of Staff Development confirmed that the expectation was for staff to ensure complete privacy, including from roommates, during personal care. Both incidents were in direct violation of the facility's own policies, which require residents to be treated with dignity, provided with appropriate clothing, and afforded privacy during personal care. The failures resulted in residents experiencing social isolation, embarrassment, and a diminished sense of dignity and autonomy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙