Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Inform Resident of Grievance Outcomes

Bakersfield, California Survey Completed on 08-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its grievance policy and procedure for one resident who reported multiple concerns, including issues with food preferences and excessive noise from a roommate's television. The resident stated that after requesting to speak with the administrator and kitchen staff regarding these concerns, no one had come to address them. Review of the Resident Grievance/Complaint Investigation Reports showed that while the complaints were documented, there was no evidence that the resident was informed of the outcome of the investigations or any actions taken to resolve the grievances. Key sections of the reports, such as signatures, dates, and notifications to the concerned party, were left blank. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON, confirmed that grievances are routed to the Social Services Director and then to the responsible department, with the administrator ultimately responsible for ensuring investigation, resolution, and communication of outcomes to the resident. However, documentation revealed that no follow-up with the resident was recorded, and the required sign-offs were missing. The facility's policy requires that residents be informed of the findings and corrective actions in a timely manner, which was not done in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙