Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan After Multiple Falls

Portola Valley, California Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to review and revise the care plan for a resident after 10 incidents of unwitnessed falls, despite the resident being identified as high risk for falls. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Peripheral Vascular Disease, pain in the left leg, cognitive communication deficit, and generalized anxiety disorder, had a history of moderate to advanced dementia and required total care. The care plan for falls was initiated, and interventions such as floor mats and a private caregiver during the day were in place. However, the care plan did not reflect input from the resident's representative, and there was no evidence that the plan was updated or revised after repeated falls, as required by facility policy and procedure. Observations and interviews revealed that staff were aware of the resident's frequent falls, particularly at night, and that the resident exhibited anxiety and confusion. The facility's fall risk assessments consistently indicated a high risk, and the resident's cognitive assessment was incomplete, with no BIMS summary score documented. Despite these findings and the facility's policy requiring the interdisciplinary team to update the care plan after falls, the care plan remained unchanged after multiple incidents, and the required comprehensive assessment and team review were not documented.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙