Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement and Communicate Proper Infection Control Precautions

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 07-26-2025

Penalty

40 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program as evidenced by two specific deficiencies. For one resident with diagnoses including necrotizing fasciitis, osteomyelitis, and chronic foot ulcers, there was no physician order for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) despite the presence of wounds on both feet. The Infection Prevention Nurse (IP) confirmed that EBP should have been ordered for this resident, as per facility policy, to ensure staff are aware of the necessary protective measures during care. Additionally, another resident with a history of cerebral infarction, pressure ulcer, muscle weakness, and sepsis was observed to have both contact precautions and EBP signage posted outside their isolation room. The IP stated that only the contact precautions sign should have been displayed due to the resident's MDRO status, as having both signs could cause confusion among staff regarding the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to use. These findings were confirmed through observation, interview, and record review, and were not in accordance with the facility's own policies on EBP and transmission-based precautions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙