Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Respond to Call Lights in a Timely Manner

Carmichael, California Survey Completed on 07-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for three of four sampled residents. One resident, admitted with acute respiratory failure and protein calorie malnutrition, reported having to wait a long time to be changed after using the call light for incontinence care. This resident was observed to be on continuous oxygen and unable to walk, and stated that delays occurred whenever she needed assistance after incontinence episodes. Another resident, with encephalopathy and cerebrovascular disease, stated that it sometimes took 30 minutes for her call light to be answered, depending on staff busyness. This resident was dependent on staff for toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, and bed mobility. A third resident, with a right humerus fracture and shoulder dislocation, reported that her call light was ignored for 15 minutes late at night before staff responded. This resident required substantial assistance for bed mobility, toileting, and dressing. Observations on the unit revealed multiple unanswered call lights. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that the expectation was for call lights to be answered within 2 to 3 minutes, and that 30 minutes was considered too long. The facility's policy required timely responses to resident requests, with staff expected to communicate estimated response times and seek assistance if needed. Despite these policies, staff did not consistently respond to call lights promptly, as evidenced by resident reports and direct observation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙