Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Perform Required Braden Scale Assessments for Pressure Injury Progression

Santa Ana, California Survey Completed on 08-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Braden scale risk assessments were performed as required for a resident with a pressure injury. According to the facility's policy, risk assessments should be conducted weekly for the first four weeks, upon significant changes in condition, or as often as needed based on the resident's status. Medical record review showed that a resident, who lacked capacity to make decisions, was readmitted and subsequently developed a Stage 1 pressure injury that progressed to Stage 2 and later to Stage 3. Documentation confirmed the progression of the wound, but there was no evidence that repeated Braden scale assessments were completed at the time of these changes. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the DON, confirmed that Braden scale assessments were not performed when the resident's pressure injury advanced from Stage 1 to Stage 2 and then to Stage 3. The LVN stated that Braden assessments were only done upon admission and not when there was a change in the wound's condition. The DON verified that the required assessments were missed during the periods when the resident's skin condition changed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙