Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Fall in High-Risk Resident with Cognitive Impairment

San Diego, California Survey Completed on 07-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with muscle weakness and severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of six, was identified as being at high risk for falls, with a Fall Risk Assessment score of 17. The resident's care plan included interventions such as anticipating needs, ensuring the call light was within reach, and providing assistance as needed. However, staff interviews revealed that the resident was unable to use the call light or effectively communicate needs, making some interventions ineffective. The resident was typically supervised at the nurses station or in the Director of Staff Development's office, where staff could monitor for safety, but on the day of the incident, the resident was left alone in his room without staff presence. During this unsupervised period, the resident fell from his wheelchair, sustained a head injury, and required hospital assessment. Staff acknowledged that the resident should have been left in an area where supervision was possible, given his high fall risk and inability to call for help. The facility's fall management policy required individualized care planning and ongoing evaluation of interventions, but the implemented strategies did not adequately address the resident's specific needs, resulting in a preventable fall with injury.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙