Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0942
E

Failure to Provide Resident Rights Training to Majority of Staff

Temple City, California Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the majority of its staff, specifically 524 out of 552 direct and indirect care staff, received in-service training on resident rights and facility responsibilities as required by facility policy. Record review showed that the Resident Rights in-service was scheduled for April 2025, but attendance records indicated that only 28 staff members attended, primarily from the night shift. There were no sign-in sheets or evidence of training for the other shifts, and both the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and the Staff Development Consultant (DSDC) confirmed that the in-service was not provided to all staff. The DSD stated it was not possible to keep track of all staff attendance, and the DSDC acknowledged the significant impact this lack of training could have on residents. Interviews with the DSD and DSDC further revealed that the facility's policy requires annual and as-needed training on resident rights for all staff, and that department heads are responsible for ensuring staff attendance at mandatory in-services. The DSD admitted that incomplete in-service attendance meant staff might be unaware of critical information regarding resident rights, including the right not to be abused and the right to receive or decline care. The facility's policy also states that lack of staff attendance should be reported to the administrator and department heads, but this process was not followed, resulting in a deficiency in staff education on resident rights.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙