Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Monitor and Supervise Resident with Wandering Behavior

Gardena, California Survey Completed on 07-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with Alzheimer's disease and moderate cognitive impairment, who was known to wander and required substantial assistance with activities of daily living, was not adequately monitored during the night shift. This resident entered another resident's room at approximately 4:00 a.m. and became trapped between beds and curtains while in a wheelchair. The incident was discovered after the roommate heard noises and alerted staff, who then found the wandering resident in the room. Documentation and interviews confirmed that the resident's wandering behavior was not monitored or recorded during the relevant shift, despite care plan interventions and facility policy requiring such monitoring for residents at risk of unsafe wandering. The resident whose room was entered had intact cognition and required supervision or assistance with daily activities. He reported the incident as a grievance, expressing concerns about privacy and safety. Staff interviews acknowledged awareness of the wandering behavior and the importance of supervision, especially at night when confusion can increase. Facility policies reviewed indicated that staff should identify and monitor residents at risk for unsafe wandering and provide supervision based on assessed needs, but these procedures were not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙