Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Ensure Proper Discharge Planning for Resident with Severe Cognitive Impairment

El Cajon, California Survey Completed on 08-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for a resident with severe cognitive impairment due to dementia and no family or surrogate decision-maker. The resident was admitted with dementia and had a BIMS score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The medical record showed that the resident was under a bioethics interdisciplinary team (IDT) and could not make medical decisions. Although a public resident representative met with the Social Service Director (SSD) to discuss criteria for a public representative, there was no documented evidence of a plan for conservatorship or that IDT meetings were conducted to address the resident's discharge needs, goals, or the appropriateness of the assisted living facility selected for discharge. The SSD documented the resident's discharge to an assisted living facility without evidence of how the decision was made, who authorized it, or whether the facility could meet the resident's dementia care needs. Interviews with the DON and SSD confirmed that no IDT meeting or third-party agency decision occurred prior to discharge, and the resident had no family member to assist in decision-making. The facility's policy required the care planning/interdisciplinary team to develop the discharge plan with the assistance of the resident and representative, but this process was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙