Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Needs and Preferences

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 06-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of two residents in several key areas. One resident, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for most activities of daily living, developed Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) in the peri-area. This was attributed to prolonged exposure to urine, as documented in progress notes and a change of condition report. The resident and her family reported that certified nursing assistants (CNAs) did not change her throughout the night, and grievances were filed regarding the lack of timely incontinence care. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was sometimes left uncleaned overnight, and that perineal care protocols were not consistently followed. Additionally, the same resident's family experienced repeated difficulties contacting her by telephone while she was in the facility. Grievance reports and interviews revealed that calls to the facility often went unanswered, particularly after receptionist hours, due to technical issues with the phone system and lapses in call transfer procedures. The family reported making numerous unsuccessful attempts to reach the facility, and staff acknowledged that calls were not always picked up or properly routed to the nursing station after hours. Both this resident and another resident were affected by ongoing issues with call light response times. Resident council meeting minutes and grievances documented that call lights were not answered promptly, with some residents waiting up to two hours for assistance and concerns about call lights being disconnected. Staff interviews confirmed that all staff were responsible for answering call lights, but this was not consistently done. Facility policies required timely response to call lights and emphasized the importance of maintaining resident dignity and respecting resident rights, but these standards were not met in practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙