Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0865
E

Failure to Monitor Effectiveness of Interventions for Timely Resident Care

Torrance, California Survey Completed on 06-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee monitored interventions related to delays in resident care, specifically regarding timely response to call lights. Multiple grievance reports documented concerns from residents about delays in receiving assistance after activating call lights. These grievances were noted on several occasions, with residents expressing dissatisfaction with the timeliness of care and customer service. Despite these documented concerns, the facility's QAPI committee did not include call light response or customer service as areas of focus in their most recent program reviews. While the Director of Nursing (DON) provided in-service education to staff on the importance of timely call light response, there was no system in place to evaluate whether these interventions were effective in improving response times or overall resident care. Interviews with the Administrator and DON confirmed the absence of a monitoring or evaluation process for these corrective actions. The facility's policy and procedure for the QAPI program outlined responsibilities such as collecting and analyzing performance data, identifying and monitoring facility systems, and evaluating performance improvement projects. However, the actual practice did not align with these responsibilities, as the QAPI committee did not track or assess the effectiveness of interventions implemented to address the identified delays in resident care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙