Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
G

Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Abuse and Inadequate Supervision

Brinkley, Arkansas Survey Completed on 07-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident abuse for two of four residents reviewed for abuse. In one incident, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, metabolic encephalopathy, and Parkinson’s disease, who was known to crawl on the floor and wander, attempted to enter another resident’s room. The second resident, also severely cognitively impaired and with a history of behavioral disturbances, kicked the first resident in the face multiple times, resulting in significant injuries including contusions, lacerations, and bruising. At the time of the incident, only one staff member was present on the secure unit, and there were no interventions in place to prevent the first resident from entering other residents’ rooms, despite known wandering behaviors. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident had been crawling around the unit since admission and that staffing levels were insufficient to monitor all residents effectively. In a separate incident, a resident with a history of traumatic brain injury, stroke, and moderate cognitive impairment sustained a laceration and a linear skull fracture after an unwitnessed event in their room. The resident reported being struck on the head by another resident, who was later seen with a razor in hand. Staff discovered the injury after hearing a commotion, and both residents involved reported that the injury was caused by the other. The facility did not immediately complete an incident report, and there was confusion among staff regarding the cause of the injury, with explanations ranging from a razor cut to being struck with a metal object. Documentation and neurological checks were lacking, and the incident was not initially logged or reported as required. Both incidents involved residents with significant cognitive and behavioral challenges residing on a secure unit. The facility’s care plans and interventions did not adequately address the risks of resident-to-resident altercations, particularly for residents with known wandering or aggressive behaviors. Staff interviews revealed gaps in supervision, incident reporting, and follow-through on required documentation, contributing to the failure to protect residents from abuse and neglect as required by facility policy and federal regulations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙