Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
E

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Residents with Indwelling Devices and Wounds

Lake Havasu City, Arizona Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for seven residents who had conditions or medical devices that, according to facility policy and professional standards, required such precautions. These residents included individuals with nephrostomy tubes, PICC lines, Foley catheters, G-tubes, tracheostomies, and chronic wounds. Despite physician orders for care related to these devices, the care plans did not reflect the need for EBP protocols or interventions. There was also no evidence of interdisciplinary communication to ensure EBP measures were in place, and no signage was posted outside the rooms of affected residents to alert staff to the need for EBP. Personal protective equipment was not readily accessible for staff use in these cases, and documentation did not indicate any resident refusals regarding infection control care plans. Observations and staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding and implementation of EBP protocols. Some staff reported following EBP procedures only when signage was present, while others relied on verbal instructions from nursing staff. The DON/Infection Preventionist stated that EBP was only applied to residents with active multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), despite the facility's policy requiring EBP for all residents with certain indwelling devices or wounds, regardless of MDRO status. The DON acknowledged a lack of signage and EBP implementation for residents who met the criteria, confirming that the current practice did not align with federal guidelines or facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙