Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
F

Failure to Provide Clear Grievance Process and Officer Information

Anchorage, Alaska Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

Fine: $148,460
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with clear and consistent instructions on how to file grievances and did not consistently communicate the identity of the grievance officer. Multiple residents interviewed during the survey expressed confusion and lack of awareness regarding the grievance process and the grievance officer, with some stating they had never heard of or met the designated official. Signage and documentation throughout the facility contained inconsistent and inaccurate contact information for the grievance officer, including incorrect email addresses and phone numbers. Additionally, the grievance process described in the Resident Admission Agreement and other facility documents conflicted with the information provided on posted signs and by staff, further contributing to resident confusion. Observations revealed that the signage in the cottages directed residents to submit concerns via a locked box or contact the grievance officer using contact details that were either incomplete or incorrect. The Assistant Administrator confirmed the inaccuracies in the posted information and acknowledged the need for updates. The grievance policy and procedure documents lacked the grievance officer's name and accurate contact information, and the process for tracking and logging grievances was informal and inconsistent, with some grievances not officially documented or logged. The grievance officer reported relying on verbal communication from staff rather than maintaining a formal grievance log. Residents also reported fears of retaliation for raising concerns, and there was a lack of evidence that resident grievances discussed in council meetings were addressed in Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. Staff training on the grievance process was inconsistent, and the oversight structure for the grievance officer was unclear. The facility's failure to provide clear, accurate, and consistent information about the grievance process and officer denied all residents and their representatives the ability to exercise their rights to file grievances correctly and receive written resolutions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙