Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Document and Assess Resident's Skin Condition

Mobile, Alabama Survey Completed on 06-27-2025

Penalty

Fine: $13,520
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure proper documentation and assessment of a resident's skin condition, specifically regarding a rash in the perineal area. The resident, who had a history of hemiplegia, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and gastrointestinal diseases, was admitted with intact skin and no noted pressure injuries. However, the medical record contained no evidence of skin concerns in the perineal area, despite later hospital documentation indicating the presence of a perineal rash. Statements from a CNA revealed that she observed a white rash, and later a white and pinkish-red rash, in the resident's perineal area on two separate occasions. Each time, she reported her findings to different LPNs, who provided cream for application but did not document the skin issue or notify a physician. Interviews with the involved LPNs showed a lack of recall or recognition of any significant skin issues, and no documentation was found regarding the reported rash. The DON confirmed that there was no documentation of skin issues in the resident's record and stated that nurses were expected to assess and document any reported changes. The Executive Director also stated that nurses were expected to document their responses to CNA reports. The lack of documentation and follow-up on the reported skin condition led to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙