Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
E

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food Allergies and Preferences

Bethel Park, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide food items that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for four out of nine residents reviewed. Specifically, one resident with a documented history of celiac disease did not have gluten intolerance noted on their admission assessment, diet order, or meal slips, despite multiple references to this condition in their hospital referral. The resident's dietary communication slip also lacked information about gluten intolerance, and their meal orders did not reflect this critical dietary need. Additionally, meal observations revealed that another resident was served chicken despite a documented dislike, a third resident received their meal on a regular plate instead of the required plastic bowls, and a fourth resident was served rice and bananas despite a documented dislike of rice and an allergy to bananas. The facility's policy required individual food preferences to be assessed and communicated upon admission, but this was not consistently implemented, resulting in residents not receiving their selected or appropriate menu items.

Plan Of Correction

Resident R4, R5, and R6 had no negative outcome for not following preference. Resident was offered a replacement meal which was accepted. Audit completed that all residents' preferences are listed. Dietary Manager or designee will educate dietary staff on following Resident Food Preference. Dietary Manager will audit tray line to ensure all preference tickets are being followed 2x a week by 2 weeks and monthly by 2 months.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙