Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Include Elopement and Fall Interventions in Resident Care Plans

Luling, Texas Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

Fine: $38,080
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two residents, as required. For one resident with a history of cerebral infarction, severe cognitive impairment, and high risk for elopement, the care plan did not include any information or interventions addressing the elopement risk, despite assessments and physician notes identifying this risk. Multiple staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness regarding residents at high risk for elopement, even though facility leadership confirmed that this resident was considered high risk. For another resident with a history of falls, moderate cognitive impairment, and significant dependence for activities of daily living, the care plan did not include specific fall prevention interventions such as keeping the bed in a low position or ensuring a fall mat was at the bedside. These interventions were present in the physician's orders but were not reflected in the care plan. Staff interviews indicated an expectation that such interventions would be documented in the care plan, and facility policy required individualized fall prevention plans based on resident risk factors. The deficiencies were identified through record reviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews, which showed that the care plans did not reflect all identified risks and physician-ordered interventions for the residents. This lack of comprehensive care planning could result in staff not being aware of or implementing necessary interventions to address the residents' medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙