Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0655
D

Failure to Include Elopement Risk in Baseline Care Plan

Luling, Texas Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

Fine: $38,080
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included necessary instructions for effective and person-centered care for a resident within 48 hours of admission. Specifically, the baseline care plan did not address the resident's identified risk for elopement, despite an admission elopement risk assessment indicating the resident was at risk and required routine monitoring. The baseline care plan incorrectly stated that the resident did not have a history of wandering or elopement and omitted interventions related to elopement risk, even though the assessment and provider investigation report confirmed the risk and subsequent elopement event. Interviews with nursing staff, the ADON, DON, and administrator revealed that care plans are expected to include critical information such as fall and elopement risks, along with appropriate interventions. Staff relied on care plans and 24-hour reports for guidance on resident care, and it was confirmed that the ADON was responsible for updating care plans with new interventions. The facility's policy required comprehensive, person-centered care plans reflecting current assessments and interventions, but this was not followed in the case of the resident who later eloped from the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙