Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Lights Were Accessible to Residents

Hewitt, Texas Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents received services with reasonable accommodations for their needs and preferences, specifically regarding the accessibility of their call lights. For one resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, observations revealed that her call light was on the floor and out of reach. The resident confirmed she could not access the call light and would have to yell for assistance if needed. Staff interviews acknowledged awareness of the importance of call light placement and that the call light was not within reach at the time of observation. Another resident, also severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff, was observed with her call light placed on top of an oxygen concentrator approximately 2.5 feet from her bed, making it inaccessible. The resident stated she could not reach the call light and instead called out for help due to pain. A CNA responded to her calls and confirmed the call light should have been clipped to the bed sheet. Staff interviews indicated knowledge of the expectation for call lights to be within reach, and that the resident sometimes threw the call light away due to her cognitive impairment. Record reviews for both residents showed care plans that included interventions to ensure call lights were within reach, and facility policy required call lights to be easily accessible for residents in bed or confined to a chair. Despite these documented expectations and staff training, observations and interviews confirmed that the call lights were not within reach for these two residents at the time of the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙