Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Ensure Call Lights Were Accessible as Care Planned

Pleasanton, Texas Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement person-centered care plans for two residents by not ensuring their call lights were within reach, as required by their individualized care plans. For one resident with hemiplegia, vascular dementia, and a history of falls, the care plan specified that the call light should be in reach to address fall risk. On observation, the call light was found wedged between the bed rail and mattress, not accessible to the resident. The resident confirmed the call light was on his side of the bed but did not indicate it was within easy reach. For another resident with a history of stroke, epilepsy, diabetes, and an above-the-knee amputation, the care plan also required the call light to be in reach due to fall risk. Observation revealed the call light was on the floor near the wall, and the resident was unaware of its location. Interviews with nursing staff, including an RN and an LVN, confirmed the importance of keeping call lights within reach for resident safety and acknowledged that the care plan should be followed. The Director of Nursing also stated that the care plan should be adhered to for patient-centered care and that call lights should always be accessible to prevent falls or ensure help in emergencies. The facility's policy emphasized that care plans are to be used as guides to identify risks and direct care needs, but in these cases, the interventions were not implemented as documented.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙