Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Accessible Call Lights for Dependent Residents

Fort Worth, Texas Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the call light systems in the rooms of two residents were accessible, as required by their care plans and facility policy. Both residents had severe cognitive impairments and were dependent on staff for activities such as transfer, toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. Observations revealed that one resident's call light was found on the floor at the foot of the bed while she was in her wheelchair, and she was unaware of its location. In the other case, the call light was observed on the floor, coiled around an IV stand, while the resident was in bed and unable to communicate its location. Interviews with staff confirmed that call lights are essential for residents to request assistance, and that staff are responsible for ensuring call lights are within reach before leaving the room. In both cases, staff acknowledged that they had not ensured the call lights were accessible after providing care or administering medication. The facility's policy requires that each resident be provided with a means to call staff for assistance from their bed and other locations, but this was not followed in these instances. The deficiency was identified through direct observation, interviews with the residents and staff, and review of medical records and care plans. The lack of accessible call lights for these residents, both of whom were at risk for falls and dependent on staff, constituted a failure to reasonably accommodate their needs and preferences as outlined in their care plans and the facility's own policies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙