Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0755
D

Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Lidocaine Patch Administration

Grapevine, Texas Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that medication aides (MAs) and nurses followed physician orders for the administration and removal of a lidocaine patch for a resident with chronic pain and moderately impaired cognition. The resident, who had a diagnosis of age-related osteoporosis and was on a scheduled pain medication regimen, was observed to have two lidocaine patches on her right hip, one dated two days prior and another from the current day. Record review showed that staff had signed off on the removal and application of patches, but the old patch was not removed before the new one was applied, contrary to the physician's order. Interviews with staff revealed that both the MA and RN involved were aware of the requirement to remove the old patch before applying a new one, and both had attended in-service training on medication administration. However, neither noticed the previous patch during their respective shifts. The facility's policy on pharmacy services did not address the specific procedure for patch administration and removal, and the DON confirmed there was no policy in place for patch removal. The failure to remove the old patch before applying a new one was not identified until it was observed by surveyors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙