Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
E

Failure to Ensure Residents Are Free from Physical Restraints Not Medically Required

Del Rio, Texas Survey Completed on 05-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents were free from physical restraints not required to treat medical symptoms. Both residents were admitted under the custody of the United States Marshal Service and were continuously shackled at the wrists, ankles, and abdomen, and supervised by armed guards. The use of these restraints was not based on medical necessity, and there were no physician orders or consents for their application documented in the residents' records. Record reviews showed that the care plans for both residents acknowledged the presence of shackles and the requirement for constant supervision by U.S. Marshals, as mandated by law enforcement and court orders. Nursing staff were instructed to monitor for skin impairment related to the restraints and to notify the Marshal's nurse case manager and assigned physician if any skin issues arose. Observations confirmed that both residents remained restrained in their rooms, with guards present at all times, and that the restraints were only temporarily loosened for specific activities such as meals. Interviews with nursing staff, facility administration, and law enforcement personnel confirmed that the restraints were applied and maintained by the Marshal Service, not the facility itself. However, the facility accepted the residents for care under these conditions without obtaining the required medical orders or consents for the restraints, as outlined in the facility's own restraint management policy. The policy emphasizes a restraint-free environment and requires that restraints only be used to treat medical symptoms with proper orders.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙